evrtng functions vs. the Cloud Giants
How does evrtng functions — powered by Fission — compare to AWS Lambda, Google Cloud Functions, and Azure Functions? Here's the honest breakdown.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature |
evrtng functions Fission + Firecracker |
AWS Lambda Amazon Web Services |
Cloud Functions Google Cloud |
Azure Functions Microsoft |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| // PRICING | ||||
| Requests | CHF 0.20 / 1M | CHF 0.20 / 1M | CHF 0.40 / 1M | CHF 0.20 / 1M |
| Compute (GB·s) | CHF 0.0000167 | CHF 0.0000166667 | CHF 0.0000100 | CHF 0.000016 |
| Free Tier (requests) | 30K / month | 1M / month | 2M / month | 1M / month |
| Idle cost | CHF 0.00 | CHF 0.00 | CHF 0.00 | CHF 0.00 |
| Pricing model | Subscription | Pay-per-use | Pay-per-use | Pay-per-use / Premium |
| evrtng prices in CHF, incl. 8.1% VAT. Cloud provider prices in USD. | ||||
| // LANGUAGES & RUNTIMES | ||||
| JavaScript / Node.js | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Python | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Java | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Go | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| PHP | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Ruby | ✓ | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ |
| .NET / C# / F# | ✗ | ✓ | ✗ | ✓ |
| Rust | ✓ (Docker) | ✓ (custom) | ✗ | ✗ |
| ANSI C | ✓ (Docker) | ✓ (custom) | ✗ | ✗ |
| Custom Docker Runtime | ✓ Native | ✓ Container Image | ✗ | ✓ (Premium) |
| Total official runtimes | 7 + Docker | 9 | 6 | 7 |
| // ARCHITECTURE & FEATURES | ||||
| Event-driven triggers | ✓ HTTP, Cron (Kafka on request) | ✓ HTTP, S3, SQS, DynamoDB… | ✓ HTTP, Pub/Sub, Firestore | ✓ HTTP, Queue, Event Hub |
| HTTP Triggers / endpoints | ✓ Built-in | ✓ via API Gateway | ✓ Built-in | ✓ Built-in |
| Max execution time | 5 min (max) | 15 min | 60 min (2nd gen) | 10 min (Consumption) |
| Max memory | 1,024 MB | 10,240 MB | 16,384 MB | 1,536 MB |
| Cold start performance | ~0.15s warm | ~100–500ms | ~100–400ms | ~200ms–2s |
| Concurrent executions | 200 | 1,000 (default, scalable) | 3,000 (regional) | Unlimited (Consumption) |
| Open Source platform | ✓ Fission (Apache-2.0) | ✗ Proprietary | ✗ Proprietary | ✓ Partially (host) |
| Self-hostable | ✓ Full control | ✗ | ✗ | ✓ via Docker |
| Vendor lock-in | Low (open standard) | High | High | Medium |
| CLI tooling | REST API | aws CLI / SAM | gcloud CLI | Azure CLI / Core Tools |
| Local development | ✓ curl / any HTTP client | ✓ SAM Local | ✓ Functions Framework | ✓ Core Tools |
// Data reflects platform capabilities as of 2025/2026. Pricing may vary by region and tier.
Where evrtng functions Stands Out
Most Languages
7 verified runtimes plus any custom Docker image. PHP, Ruby, Go, ANSI C — languages other platforms dropped or never supported.
No Vendor Lock-in
Built on Fission — open source under Apache-2.0 and Kubernetes-native. Your functions are plain code and Docker images. Take your code and go.
Firecracker Isolation
Every function runs in its own Firecracker micro-VM — hardened isolation no hyperscaler offers at this price. Your neighbours never share your kernel.
Flexible Triggers
HTTP and cron triggers — connect events without proprietary glue services. Kafka integration on request.
Tenant URLs Built-in
Every function gets its own URL under {namespace}.fnc4.evrtng.cloud with TLS, rate limiting, and billing built in. No API Gateway required.
Battle-tested Core
Built on Fission, a Kubernetes-native open-source project under the Apache Software Foundation — hardened with Kata Containers and Firecracker micro-VMs.
When to Choose evrtng functions
✓ Great fit if you…
→ Consider alternatives if you…
Deploy your first function today
No credit card for the first deployment. Transparent billing from request one.
